Sushruta Samhita Shloka1/21/2021
Likewise, Ur. E. Sharma and Bhagwan Dash, few among the Everyday terms translators of Ayurveda Dipika said that Chakrapani cited the sights of skilled physicians relating to whom the text in verse no. 50 will be unauthentic. Nevertheless, he himself offers not refuted the authénticity of this text message. 6 This is usually because after detailing 36 Tantra-Yuktis, Chakrapani stated in his commentary on Charaka Sámhita that in addition to the over mentioned 36 Tantra-yuktis, there are usually 15 forms of Vyakhyas (details), 7 varieties of Kalpana (arrangements), 21 varieties of Arthashrayas (ramifications) and 14 sorts of Tantra-Doshas (problems in structure).Email: moc.oohay0002yenohoop Copyright: AYU (An Essential Quarterly Paper of Research in Ayurveda) This is usually an open-access post distributed under the terms of the Innovative Commons Attribution-NoncommerciaI-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which allows unrestricted make use of, submission, and reproduction in any medium, offered the initial work is definitely properly cited.Summary In the existing situation, the obtainable versions of Charaka Samhita consist of eight Sthanas just.
Charaka Samhita does not contain Uttara-Tantra Iike Sushruta Samhita ánd Samhitas of Vágbhata. On opposite, in the 12 th part of Siddhi Sthana, Charaka provides stated about Uttara-Tántra of Charaka Sámhita. So, it can be important to emphasize on this problem, which had been not explained in size by bloggers of Charaka Samhita. Several controversies elevated on the lifestyle and identification of Uttara-Tántra of Charaka Sámhita. On the other hands, some students who fit in to a later period have got been mentioned certain work references in their function, which are usually stated to become from Uttara-Tántra of Charaka Sámhita. After a thorough research and encoding of available novels, it is agreed that, Charaka Uttara-Tantra has been existing up to the time of Nishchalakara (13 th one hundred year Advertisement). Nishchalakara provides quoted a number of personal references in Ratnaprabha, which are from Uttara-Tántra of Charaka Sámhita. ![]() Keywords: Chakrapanidatta, Cháraka Samhita, Nishchalakara, Rátnaprabha, Tika, Uttara Tántra Introduction Samhitas are regarded as as highly codified store houses of historic wisdom. Samhitas have got their own design of narrating classics like as Sthana, Chátushka, Adhyaya, Sutra, ShIoka, Pada etc., Details have ended up shown in Sutra type in Samhitas ánd in commentaries thé same have been viewed and elaborated in the form of Bhashya. Thus, the commentaries function the purpose of Bhashya ón the Sámhitas, which not only give meaning of words and phrases but furthermore complement the concepts by decorating additional info on the subjects. Sushruta Samhita Shloka Verification Provides HisThe commentator quotes the prior authors and after essential verification provides his personal conclusion structured on either being rejected or agreement on reasonable grounds. This demands a broad and comprehensive knowledge of the present literature of Samhitas ánd commentaries aIong with adequate history of allied novels. Furthermore, a commentator wants important and analytical faculty by which he can confirm the information and arrive at a rational conclusion. Also, Uttara-Tantra has been considered as a shop home of topics, which are usually not really present in servings of primary Samhitas. Presence of Uttara-Tántra of Charaka Sámhita provides been pointed out in Siddhi Sthána of Charaka Sámhita. This can be not referred by any various other scholars. The significance of the Shloka is certainly for the true understanding of this treatise according to the Guná and Dosha, thése Tantra-Yuktis wiIl become explained as soon as once again in detail in Uttara-Tantra. This portion is supposed to be to Dridhabala, whó supplemented 17 chapters of Chikitsa Sthana, 12 chapters each of Kalpa and Siddhi Sthanas. In the over context, Chakrapanidatta, quoted that this passage is not really authoritative one. He opined thát Uttara-Tantra óf Charaka Samhita ás Anarsha, which indicates Sambuddhau Shakalyasyettau Anarshe (not owed to thé Rishi ór which can be not Vedic), 4 because there is no Uttara-tántra in Agniveshatantra. These are the sights of somé Hindi translators óf Chakrapanidattas Ayurveda Dipiká on Charaka Sámhita. ![]() According to Prof. P. Sixth is v. Sharma, it pertains to the Uttára-Tantra, which deals with the exposition of Tantra-Yuktis, but this is certainly considered as unauthoritativé by elders ás the existence of the Uttara-Tantra itself in the Agniveshatantra is certainly not authentic. It indicates that in specific customs, the Uttara-Tantra existed dealing with Tantra-Yuktis and some other allied matters. This displays that based to Prof. P. V. Sharma some of the older doctors of Chakrapani regarded the Uttara-Tántra as unauthoritativé, but not Chakrapani himself. Prof. P. V. Sharma furthermore not really refuted the authénticity of Uttara-Tántra. Likewise, L. E. Sharma and Bhagwan Splash, few among the British translators of Ayurveda Dipika mentioned that Chakrapani offered the sights of experienced physicians regarding to whom the text message in verse no. ![]() This is usually because after detailing 36 Tantra-Yuktis, Chakrapani mentioned in his discourse on Charaka Sámhita that in add-on to the over described 36 Tantra-yuktis, there are usually 15 types of Vyakhyas (answers), 7 forms of Kalpana (arrangements), 21 varieties of Arthashrayas (ramifications) and 14 varieties of Tantra-Doshas (flaws in structure).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |